|
| |
| |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Family
Law
(817)285-2855
304 Harwood Road Bedford Texas 76021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY
AND DEBTS |
|
This will give a simple understanding of separate and
community property laws in Texas. Please consult a lawyer to confirm
if your conclusions are correct. There are many confusing applications
of the basic law that may lead you to the wrong conclusion. |
|
1. Types of Property
In the context of divorce law in Texas, all property, both real and
personal, is characterized as two different types of property: (1) "separate
property" and (2) "community property".
|
|
a. Separate Property
"Separate property" is property either (1) owned or acquired by a spouse
before marriage, or (2) acquired by a spouse during marriage by either
(a) gift or (b) inheritance. It is the date of acquisition and the source
of the property that controls, not how it is eventually paid for. For example,
if one spouse owned a house or a car before marriage, it will be characterized
at the time of divorce as that spouse's separate property, even if it was
paid off in whole or in part during marriage.
A gift includes, for example, any Christmas or birthday gifts from one
spouse to another during marriage (even if purchased with community funds).
If a gift or inheritance goes to both spouses (e.g., wedding gifts), then
each spouse has an undivided fifty percent interest in that one piece of
separate property.
Owned before marriage can be wedding rings (also gift), 401K contributions or
a house. Separate property can change forms without changing its character as
separate property (this is often referred to as a "mutation"). For example,
if wife has $5,000 in cash which is her separate property and uses that
$5,000 cash alone to purchase outright a $5,000 boat, then the boat would
likewise be her separate property.
A court has no authority to take a spouse's separate property from him
or her at the time of divorce. Caution: Any property owned
by either spouse at the time of divorce is, by law, presumed to be "community
property" unless otherwise provided to be separate property (see discussion
of "community property presumption" below); therefore, a spouse must (1)
specifically plead and (2) prove by clear and convincing evidence each
item of real or personal property claimed to be his separate property.
|
b. Community Property
"Community property" is any property acquired by either or both spouses
during marriage by other than gift or inheritance. This includes virtually
everything purchased during marriage. It is important to remember that
a marriage legally endures even after separation: therefore, anything earned,
purchased, or even merely contracted for, during your separation (whether
before or after the divorce petition has been flied) will be characterized
as community property. This is true even if the property is not physically
received until after marriage. For example, if the day before the divorce
is granted a wife contacts to purchase a new home (with closing set off
for one month later), or husband enters into a partnership agreement, this
will be characterized as community property.
All property which exists in whole or in part in the name of either
spouse at the time of divorce is presumed by law to be community property.
This is referred to as the "community property presumption". Therefore,
if you have any separate property, or if you are in possession of property
which does not belong to either you or your spouse, you must point these
out to your attorney.
In Texas, earnings from separate property are community property. For
example, if husband has $5,000 in a bank account at the date of marriage,
the $5,000 remains his separate property, but all interest earned on the
$5,000 becomes community property.
Unlike separate property, a court has the authority to divide community
property in any manner that it deems to be "just and right' (as discussed
in more detail below).
|
|
C. Out Of-State Real Property
Real estate located outside of Texas, which was purchased while either
or both spouses were domiciled outside of Texas, is treated somewhat differently
than "community property" or "separate property". If such foreign realty
exits, please let me know.
|
|
|
D. Mixed Title to Property
Title to property can be both separate property and community property
in character. For example, suppose a car is bought during marriage for
a total of $10,000 in cash; $6,000 of that was from husband's separate
property account which he had prior to marriage, while $4,000 of it was
from a bank account established during marriage and containing the community
property earnings of the parties. In such event, title to the automobile
would be sixty percent husband's separate property and forty percent community
property.
|
|
2. Debts and Liabilities: Taxes
Debts and liabilities incurred before marriage, if still in existence
at the time of divorce, shall remain the debt of liability of the party
who incurred it. Debts incurred during marriage will be divided by the
court between the parties at the time of divorce. One spouse may be required
to assume a debt incurred solely by another spouse during marriage. There is no
such thing as a "community" debt, although the term is commonly used. Although
not an absolute rule, the general rule of thumb is that, following the
filing of the divorce petition, courts are usually going to award a debt
to the spouse who incurred the debt during separation. Decisions will also
need be made regarding contingent liabilities, such as past income tax
liabilities which may arise in the future if the parties are audited, as
well as tax liabilities for the year of divorce.
Caution: Although a court will order each spouse to be
solely responsible for certain debts and to pay them immediately when due,
this is binding only as between the parties. This division, however is
not binding upon the third party creditors who are not parties to the lawsuit.
This is unavoidable unless every creditor (e.g., Master card, Visa, etc.)
is actually made a party to your suit and, even then, the court would probably
make one party primarily liable and the other party secondarily liable.
The only protection is by way of indemnification, that is, if Spouse A
is obligated to pay a bill, but does not do so and the creditor goes after
Spouse B, Souse B has the right to sue Souse A to recoup those funds. While
this is not a very good solution, it is the only practical one available
while a lien can be placed against one spouse's property to assure the
payment by that spouse of court ordered debts, most parties and judges
will not agree to so indefinitely tie up a person's property in this respect.
|
|
|
3. Reimbursement
Pursuant to the rules above, there may at the time of divorce exist
three different "estates": (1) husband's separate property estate; (2)
wife's separate property estate; and (3) the community estate. Each of
these estates may have a "claim for reimbursement" back against the other
estate or estates. For example, if husband owned a car, as well as a note
on that car, before marriage, then at the time of the divorce the car will
belong to husband's separate estate, but the community estate would have
a right to ask a court to order the husband (i.e., his separate estate)
to "reimburse" the community estate for community funds used to pay off
his separate property car. This is one very simple example of the doctrine
of "reimbursement". Again, reimbursement can be by, against, and between
any of the three estates.
Since reimbursement is an "equitable" doctrine, a court is not required
to order reimbursement, but may choose to do so if the court considers
it equitable under all of the circumstances of the case. lt should be noted,
however, that to prove reimbursement, if often requires a great deal of
time, accounting, "tracing" of funds (discussed below) and expense to prove
the claim. Whether reimbursement should be sought is a decision you and
your attorney will make after weighing all of the factors.
|
|
3. Reimbursement
Pursuant to the rules above, there may at the time of divorce exist
three different "estates": (1) husband's separate property estate; (2)
wife's separate property estate; and (3) the community estate. Each of
these estates may have a "claim for reimbursement" back against the other
estate or estates. For example, if husband owned a car, as well as a note
on that car, before marriage, then at the time of the divorce the car will
belong to husband's separate estate, but the community estate would have
a right to ask a court to order the husband (i.e., his separate estate)
to "reimburse" the community estate for community funds used to pay off
his separate property car. This is one very simple example of the doctrine
of "reimbursement". Again, reimbursement can be by, against, and between
any of the three estates.
Since reimbursement is an "equitable" doctrine, a court is not required
to order reimbursement, but may choose to do so if the court considers
it equitable under all of the circumstances of the case. lt should be noted,
however, that to prove reimbursement, if often requires a great deal of
time, accounting, "tracing" of funds (discussed below) and expense to prove
the claim. Whether reimbursement should be sought is a decision you and
your attorney will make after weighing all of the factors.
|
|
|
4. Tracing
To determine title to property as being separate property and/or community
property, and to determine rights to reimbursement between the different
marital estates, an accounting method referred to as tracing" if often
employed in divorce cases. For example, one bank account may contain funds
which consists of both separate property and community property. Or. community
property funds may be used to pay off a balance of a separate property
debt. Tracing is employed to determine the title to property or the amount
of reimbursement:.
Doctrine of commingling: If funds in an account contain both
separate property funds and community property funds and these funds have
been so commingled as to defy a clear divorce time segregation by means
of tracing, then the entire account: will be characterized as community
property (because of the "community property presumption" discussion above).
This is referred to as the doctrine of "commingling". |
|
| |
|
|
Thanks again for visiting
the website of
Diane M. Wanger.
To schedule a consultation, please call us today at
(817) 285-2855. |
This page last updated 7/7/10
This
article was adapted from the work of California attorney, Glenn
Rabenn, whose permission to do so is greatly appreciated. |